Chiosa
Research collection

AI & Agents

Research on AI & Agents: explanations, evidence, limitations and connections between papers.

33 results

  1. Guided lessonAI & Agents

    Place evidence at the decision it needs to inform

    A robot can misread a grasp, a game can compile while behaving badly, and a tool-using agent can approach a change it cannot take back. Intermediate evidence matters only through the decision that receives it. Across four studies, traces inform robot control, website evaluation, later robot actions, or review of a drafted tool call. Their reported outcomes describe different tasks and measures; the useful first step is to identify the decision each trace is meant to support.

  2. Guided lessonAI & Agents

    Match each distillation choice to its measured outcome

    A team distilling a model can supervise fewer generated tokens, change who generates its training responses, or ask it to produce an answer in fewer decoding steps. Each choice changes a different part of the process, so a quality gain under one choice does not establish a shared saving in computation or stored memory. The studies offer a practical starting rule: name the choice, the behavior being measured, and the comparison before interpreting a result. Their reported gains belong to particular tasks and protocols.